Friday, October 12, 2012

Beauty, No Beast

His name is Carmel. Easier to say than the candy-color of his beautiful coat.
I can't say whether he will become the star of a children's book as did his predecessor, Leonardo da Cat. Can't say if he would have survived the wilds of my 9th Street backyard and neighborhood, either,  because he's back. Glory be! His sneaking out the atrium when the "door of opportunity" cracked, made for a dark hour of tense reflection. But true to his feline instinct, he sneaked right back in when he had endured enough of cold and wet grass. Hopefully we--and he--learned a lesson: It's better to reflect on all that's good and easily had than to wander aimlessly without support. With luck and dilligence, he won't get a repeat oppportunity.

Great-granddaughter, Lucy, at fifteen months recently discovered that little fingers in Carmel's coat feel even better than the fuzzies in her board book about baby pets. Hands-on learning even trumps books.



 
                          Carmel reflects: MY FACE--MY WINDOW!

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Out To Lunch

Not really, but there sure is a gap between posts and for once, it's not my fault. This handy gadget is only useful as it's up and running and when the power cord is NOT supplying juice, the laptop goes into coma mode--unexpected and unsuspected for so recent a purchase.

My connection with words in the interim has been in reading, only. Not many word-use errors to report, but here are three in one book: "Sara laid down next to , , , "  and ". . . sick little cherubs laying side by side."    Kind of makes you feel like saying "CLUCK! CLUCK!" doesn't it? Even before that in the story a character was ". . . gesturing up the stairs for her to proceed him."  Now don't tell me those were typos. And where was the proof-reader or line editor to have allowed such errors submitted by one of their established contributors?

GOOD NEWS: I just finished reading a novel with NO BOO-BOOS!
BAD NEWS: I came within a second of cancelling my onlineWord-A-Day because yesterday Anu Garg posted the word apostle and referenced its meaning with a blatantly political slam against one of the presidential candidates. How unwarranted and lowbrow!